Mailman 3 December 2002 - Mailman-Developers

[ mailman-Patches-646884 ] HyperArch.py multibyte charset
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 7, 2002

Dec. 7, 2002

Patches item #646884, was opened at 2002-12-02 06:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=646884&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: Mailman 2.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: HyperArch.py multibyte charset Initial Comment: HyperArch.py in 2.1b5 use Utils.uquote() for CGIescape() and html_quote() but it does not take language argument. This is no good for multilbyte charset because characters are escaped in separate 8bit bytes which results in mojibake. We should rather use Utils.uncanonstr() to honor the legal characters within the multibyte charset. This patch fixes other minor bugs in the current code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 23:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Never mind, I saw your follow up in mailman-i18n. That's good enough for me, so I'll apply the patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 23:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Tokio, do you have an answer for Martin's question? If this solves a real problem w/ Japanese, I'm happy to apply it, but it would be good to have a sample or test case that fails without it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Date: 2002-12-07 20:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=67709 I think I have to generate new translation regarding the date format problem. Sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Date: 2002-12-07 20:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=67709 Thanks Barry. The patch was successfully applied and things are worklng better. (a new i18n problem in date format, though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) Date: 2002-12-07 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Tokio, can you please explain the problem in more detail? Utils.uquote will always return 7bit strings only, potentially with nested HTML character references. Why could this cause a problem in a multi-byte encoding? Can you refer to a page that looks incorrectly because of that? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Here's a new version of the patch that applies cleanly to current cvs. I'm not sure I'm testing it well enough, so could you take a look? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=646884&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Patches-646884 ] HyperArch.py multibyte charset
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 7, 2002

Dec. 7, 2002

Patches item #646884, was opened at 2002-12-02 06:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=646884&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: Mailman 2.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: HyperArch.py multibyte charset Initial Comment: HyperArch.py in 2.1b5 use Utils.uquote() for CGIescape() and html_quote() but it does not take language argument. This is no good for multilbyte charset because characters are escaped in separate 8bit bytes which results in mojibake. We should rather use Utils.uncanonstr() to honor the legal characters within the multibyte charset. This patch fixes other minor bugs in the current code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 23:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Tokio, do you have an answer for Martin's question? If this solves a real problem w/ Japanese, I'm happy to apply it, but it would be good to have a sample or test case that fails without it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Date: 2002-12-07 20:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=67709 I think I have to generate new translation regarding the date format problem. Sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Date: 2002-12-07 20:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=67709 Thanks Barry. The patch was successfully applied and things are worklng better. (a new i18n problem in date format, though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) Date: 2002-12-07 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Tokio, can you please explain the problem in more detail? Utils.uquote will always return 7bit strings only, potentially with nested HTML character references. Why could this cause a problem in a multi-byte encoding? Can you refer to a page that looks incorrectly because of that? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Here's a new version of the patch that applies cleanly to current cvs. I'm not sure I'm testing it well enough, so could you take a look? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=646884&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-650147 ] archived with bad dates / out of range
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 7, 2002

Dec. 7, 2002

Bugs item #650147, was opened at 2002-12-07 14:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=650147&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mentor Cana (mcana) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: archived with bad dates / out of range Initial Comment: Here is one of these messages with a bad date that when archived gets archived with the date of the archive task. So, when rebuilding archives it is archived wrongly. Example: the message attached should be archived with a date of "Apr 9 2000" and instead gets archived with today's data if rebuild today. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 21:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Actually, Mailman adds an X-List-Received-Header, but it looks like pipermail doesn't use it. Dang, I thought it did. Will make it so. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Carson Gaspar (cgaspar) Date: 2002-12-07 18:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=664506 There is an alternative that makes mailman "Do the Right Thing". Have mailman add an X-Mailman-Archived-Date header to the message if the Date header is missing or mangled (or perhaps optionally always). Then have the archiver use this header if the Date header is bogus (or always if you want to ignore the message date entirely). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Actually, sorry, if this /is/ the file you sent to me then Mailman is doing the right thing. The Date header in that message has a year of 100, which is totally bogus. Mailman has no other way to archive the file except by using the received date, so it's doing the correct thing. I think this is one of several messages you've sent me that has broken date headers. Maybe your mail server needs fixing? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Oops, is this supposed to be the file you sent to me separately? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Mentor, there's no attached file. Did you forget to check the checkbox? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=650147&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Patches-646884 ] HyperArch.py multibyte charset
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 7, 2002

Dec. 7, 2002

Patches item #646884, was opened at 2002-12-02 11:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=646884&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: Mailman 2.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: HyperArch.py multibyte charset Initial Comment: HyperArch.py in 2.1b5 use Utils.uquote() for CGIescape() and html_quote() but it does not take language argument. This is no good for multilbyte charset because characters are escaped in separate 8bit bytes which results in mojibake. We should rather use Utils.uncanonstr() to honor the legal characters within the multibyte charset. This patch fixes other minor bugs in the current code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Date: 2002-12-08 01:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=67709 I think I have to generate new translation regarding the date format problem. Sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Date: 2002-12-08 01:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=67709 Thanks Barry. The patch was successfully applied and things are worklng better. (a new i18n problem in date format, though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) Date: 2002-12-07 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Tokio, can you please explain the problem in more detail? Utils.uquote will always return 7bit strings only, potentially with nested HTML character references. Why could this cause a problem in a multi-byte encoding? Can you refer to a page that looks incorrectly because of that? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 16:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Here's a new version of the patch that applies cleanly to current cvs. I'm not sure I'm testing it well enough, so could you take a look? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=646884&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Patches-646884 ] HyperArch.py multibyte charset
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 7, 2002

Dec. 7, 2002

Patches item #646884, was opened at 2002-12-02 11:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=646884&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: Mailman 2.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: HyperArch.py multibyte charset Initial Comment: HyperArch.py in 2.1b5 use Utils.uquote() for CGIescape() and html_quote() but it does not take language argument. This is no good for multilbyte charset because characters are escaped in separate 8bit bytes which results in mojibake. We should rather use Utils.uncanonstr() to honor the legal characters within the multibyte charset. This patch fixes other minor bugs in the current code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Date: 2002-12-08 01:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=67709 Thanks Barry. The patch was successfully applied and things are worklng better. (a new i18n problem in date format, though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) Date: 2002-12-07 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Tokio, can you please explain the problem in more detail? Utils.uquote will always return 7bit strings only, potentially with nested HTML character references. Why could this cause a problem in a multi-byte encoding? Can you refer to a page that looks incorrectly because of that? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 16:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Here's a new version of the patch that applies cleanly to current cvs. I'm not sure I'm testing it well enough, so could you take a look? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=646884&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-650147 ] archived with bad dates / out of range
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 7, 2002

Dec. 7, 2002

Bugs item #650147, was opened at 2002-12-07 14:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=650147&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mentor Cana (mcana) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: archived with bad dates / out of range Initial Comment: Here is one of these messages with a bad date that when archived gets archived with the date of the archive task. So, when rebuilding archives it is archived wrongly. Example: the message attached should be archived with a date of "Apr 9 2000" and instead gets archived with today's data if rebuild today. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Carson Gaspar (cgaspar) Date: 2002-12-07 18:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=664506 There is an alternative that makes mailman "Do the Right Thing". Have mailman add an X-Mailman-Archived-Date header to the message if the Date header is missing or mangled (or perhaps optionally always). Then have the archiver use this header if the Date header is bogus (or always if you want to ignore the message date entirely). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Actually, sorry, if this /is/ the file you sent to me then Mailman is doing the right thing. The Date header in that message has a year of 100, which is totally bogus. Mailman has no other way to archive the file except by using the received date, so it's doing the correct thing. I think this is one of several messages you've sent me that has broken date headers. Maybe your mail server needs fixing? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Oops, is this supposed to be the file you sent to me separately? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Mentor, there's no attached file. Did you forget to check the checkbox? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=650147&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-650147 ] archived with bad dates / out of range
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 7, 2002

Dec. 7, 2002

Bugs item #650147, was opened at 2002-12-07 14:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=650147&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mentor Cana (mcana) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: archived with bad dates / out of range Initial Comment: Here is one of these messages with a bad date that when archived gets archived with the date of the archive task. So, when rebuilding archives it is archived wrongly. Example: the message attached should be archived with a date of "Apr 9 2000" and instead gets archived with today's data if rebuild today. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Actually, sorry, if this /is/ the file you sent to me then Mailman is doing the right thing. The Date header in that message has a year of 100, which is totally bogus. Mailman has no other way to archive the file except by using the received date, so it's doing the correct thing. I think this is one of several messages you've sent me that has broken date headers. Maybe your mail server needs fixing? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Oops, is this supposed to be the file you sent to me separately? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Mentor, there's no attached file. Did you forget to check the checkbox? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=650147&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-650147 ] archived with bad dates / out of range
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 7, 2002

Dec. 7, 2002

Bugs item #650147, was opened at 2002-12-07 14:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=650147&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mentor Cana (mcana) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: archived with bad dates / out of range Initial Comment: Here is one of these messages with a bad date that when archived gets archived with the date of the archive task. So, when rebuilding archives it is archived wrongly. Example: the message attached should be archived with a date of "Apr 9 2000" and instead gets archived with today's data if rebuild today. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Oops, is this supposed to be the file you sent to me separately? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Mentor, there's no attached file. Did you forget to check the checkbox? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=650147&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-650147 ] archived with bad dates / out of range
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 7, 2002

Dec. 7, 2002

Bugs item #650147, was opened at 2002-12-07 14:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=650147&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mentor Cana (mcana) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: archived with bad dates / out of range Initial Comment: Here is one of these messages with a bad date that when archived gets archived with the date of the archive task. So, when rebuilding archives it is archived wrongly. Example: the message attached should be archived with a date of "Apr 9 2000" and instead gets archived with today's data if rebuild today. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Mentor, there's no attached file. Did you forget to check the checkbox? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=650147&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-646596 ] wrong install path
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 7, 2002

Dec. 7, 2002

Bugs item #646596, was opened at 2002-12-01 15:24 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=646596&group_i… Category: configuring/installing Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthias Klose (doko) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: wrong install path Initial Comment: ./usr/lib/mailman/pythonlib [...] ./usr/lib/mailman/pythonlib/japanese ./usr/lib/mailman/pythonlib/japanese/__init__.py [...] ./usr/lib/mailman/pythonlib/lib/python2.2 ./usr/lib/mailman/pythonlib/lib/python2.2/site-packages ./usr/lib/mailman/pythonlib/lib/python2.2/site-packages/japanese.pth the last one is at least not found, because it's installed in mailman's prefix, not in python's prefix ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-07 18:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 It's a little ugly but I don't think it matters much to Mailman's operation, so I don't intend to fix it, at least not for MM2.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=646596&group_i…

1 0