Mailman-Developers May 2012

mailman-developers@python.org

20 participants
56 discussions

before next release: disable backscatter in default installation
by Jo Rhett 07 Nov '22

07 Nov '22

Hi. There's a fairly simple problem here that needs to be addressed. And it's mostly a documentation/install problem. I'm hoping we can get this resolved before the next release. PROBLEM: Mailman comes out of the box ready to backscatter spam people. Yes, it's easy enough to fix. But because it comes stock this way, and is documented to install this way, most people install it to do this. Those of us who work in abuse departments are tired of hearing "well that's how Mailman works". We also object to having to teach people how to fix their mailman installations because it's not documented in the current manual. This is *exactly* like Sendmail 14 years ago. We didn't accept it then, and Sendmail fixed the problem. RESOLUTION: Mailman default installation should not backscatter in a default configuration. 1. Don't create backscatter aliases for subscribe/unsubscribe/etc by default. Nearly everyone uses web based signup. 2. Discard or hold messages from non-subscribers by default. I would think that it would be perfectly reasonable to have documentation on how to enable the 1980s-style -request / -subscribe etc aliases. However this documentation should have a note that this is against the AUP of nearly every network provider, and enabling it will likely cause them to get listed in various blacklists as a backscatter source. FYI: I know that this goes against the instincts of many old-time mailing list advocates here. But after dealing with a 10k/hour backscatter DoS my tolerance for this problem is understandably limited. Yes, it was a sweet day back in the 1980s. I was running a mailing list server and several UUCP gateways at the time, so I remember them well. But those days are past, and we need to deal with the reality of today. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness

21 168

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [GSoC 2012] Metrics
by Stephen J. Turnbull 15 Jul '12

15 Jul '12

George Chatzisofroniou writes: > Author > > This model represents an author of the mailing list. It mostly keeps > track of the number of postings and number of threads started. It has > the following fields: > > - authorid – IntegerField AFAIK every Django object has an internal ID. Why do authors need a separate, human-unfriendly "authorid"? > - authormail – CharField Authors are people. They typically have names<wink/> and often multiple email addresses. There may also be other information (organization, etc) that is available from the headers. > - totalmails – IntegerField > - totalthreads – IntegerField > - firstmsgdate – DateTimeField > - lastmsgdate – DateTimeField > > MailingList > > This model counts the total number of postings and threads started. > > - totalmails – IntegerField > - totalthreads – IntegerField longestthread? > > Month > > Year > > Views > > To display the metrics the Django template system will be used. To > output the charts i will create some custom tags. The three following > views will be used: > > - General page – On top, there will be general metrics about total > authors, total mails and total threads and below three charts (AJAX > based) "AJAX based" doesn't belong in the spec; it's an implementation detail. > that represent number of posts per author, number of threads > per author and mailing list’s yearly usage. Even below there will be a > number of charts (equal to the number of years of list’s existence) > that output monthly usage. Why multiple charts? If you can afford a 640x480 chart area, with 4 pixel wide bars you can have 160 months > 13 years in one chart. I personally wouldn't hesitate to go to pixel width bars, which gives you > 53 years. I don't think people will be looking at charts for precision, but rather to get an overview. > At the end, there will be tabular data representing the authors > > - Author page – Each user will have his own page with his own metrics. > > Django Admin page – A ‘Generate’ button will be added to the Django admin page. > Settings > > The Django app should handle the following configuration parameters: > > - Host – Message store data host > - Port – Message store data port > - Masking – A multi-state variable (None, abbreviated, full) for > masking email addresses at the results (we don’t want the emails to be > spammed) (1) If at all possible, this should be inherited from the list configuration (DRY). It's not useful if the addresses are available from the archives or by subscribing to the list. (Actually, a really sophisticated spammer might want to attack by spoofing frequent posters on the assumption they're more trusted and more read, but that seems second-order to me.) (2) It would be preferable if authors could supply nicknames, full names, or avatars for this purpose. > Interface to the Mailman core > > - Metrics class > > - Generate class

4 4

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [GSoC 2012] Metrics
by Patrick Ben Koetter 26 Jun '12

26 Jun '12

George, let me throw in some thoughts just to annoy you ;) Like with most statistical data I mostly see the figures being used to give statements on quantity - top poster, number of threads etc. Do you think it would be possible to also make some statements on quality? Let me give an example: Mailing lists are often places where people go to ask for advice. Someone asking usually starts a thread and continually keeps replying. That easily makes a person top poster and might make the same person a thread starter, but number of posts and threads started gives no indication of that persons knowledge (concerning the mailing lists topic). OTOH someone who has been on the list for ages, who replies more often than starting threads and who ends threads often after she has replied might very well be a very knowledgeable person, because she gives the one answer that solves the problem. Do you think it would be possible to deduct such quality oriented statements? p@rick P.S. Do you also plan to deliver a tool that analyzes a mailing list archive in order to gather your statistical data? Having the statistical data might be a good reason for people to upgrade their MMx installation to MM3. * George Chatzisofroniou <sophron(a)latthi.com>: > The following document is the lowest level of my design concept. You > may also read it in my blog [1]. Of course, comments are very welcome. > > -- > Models > > In order to store statistical data, the app will use some Django models: > > Author > > This model represents an author of the mailing list. It mostly keeps > track of the number of postings and number of threads started. It has > the following fields: > > - authorid – IntegerField > - authormail – CharField > - totalmails – IntegerField > - totalthreads – IntegerField > - firstmsgdate – DateTimeField > - lastmsgdate – DateTimeField > > MailingList > > This model counts the total number of postings and threads started. > > - totalmails – IntegerField > - totalthreads – IntegerField > > Month > > This model associates the author and the mailing list with each month. > > - author – ForeignKey > - month – CharField > - postscount – IntegerField > - threadscount – IntegerField > - mailinglist – Boolean (if this is true it corresponds to the whole > mailing list) > > Year > > This model is similar to month. It has a year field instead of a month field. > > Views > > To display the metrics the Django template system will be used. To > output the charts i will create some custom tags. The three following > views will be used: > > - General page – On top, there will be general metrics about total > authors, total mails and total threads and below three charts (AJAX > based) that represent number of posts per author, number of threads > per author and mailing list’s yearly usage. Even below there will be a > number of charts (equal to the number of years of list’s existence) > that output monthly usage. At the end, there will be tabular data > representing the authors of the mailing list along with their number > of posts, number of threads started and the date of their last post. > The user will be able to order the tabular data (alphabetically, > ascending/descending on number of posts, number of threads, date of > last message) by clicking on the table’s headings (Mail, Mails Sent, > Threads Started, Last Message). > > - Author page – Each user will have his own page with his own metrics. > On top, there will be the email of the author, number of posts, number > of threads started and the dates of first and last message. Below > there will be monthly usage charts for each year the user is > subscribed to the mailing list. > Django Admin page – A ‘Generate’ button will be added to the Django admin page. > Settings > > The Django app should handle the following configuration parameters: > > - Host – Message store data host > - Port – Message store data port > - Masking – A multi-state variable (None, abbreviated, full) for > masking email addresses at the results (we don’t want the emails to be > spammed) > > Interface to the Mailman core > > - Metrics class – When a new post is sent, the Metrics class will > receive it through the IArchiver interface. The Posts field of the > Mailing List model (as well as the the related rows on the Month and > Year models) will increase by one. If the author’s email is not in the > database, it will query the mailman core database with the email, grab > the author’s id and a new Author row will be created. Otherwise if the > author is already in the database, the Posts field and the two foreign > fields (Month and Year) will increase by one > > - Generate class – When the ‘Generate’ button on the Admin page is pressed: > * The Django models will be initialized (the metrics will go back to > zero). A progress bar will inform the administrator that the operation > is being processed. > * All the messages of the archive will be parsed by performing a > direct Python call to the IArchiver. Another instance to the IArchiver > will grab any mails sent while the parsing is going on. > * The metrics will be generated from scratch. > * The administrator will be informed with a success message when the > process is over. > > [1]: http://sophron.latthi.com/gsoc-mailman/ > > -- > George Chatzisofroniou > sophron.latthi.com > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-Developers mailing list > Mailman-Developers(a)python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers > Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/p%40state-of-mind… > > Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 -- state of mind () http://www.state-of-mind.de Franziskanerstraße 15 Telefon +49 89 3090 4664 81669 München Telefax +49 89 3090 4666 Amtsgericht München Partnerschaftsregister PR 563

2 2

Speaking about kitties (or archivers)
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 06 Jun '12

06 Jun '12

Meeow miaou* We spoke on IRC about the archiver the other day and I said that I should present here my thoughts about it. So here they are (beware that might be long). First I think we should think about the structure/architecture of things. We have a number of component which need to be archives aware, without being exhaustive I'm thinking about: - the archiver itself (which present the archive (ie: mails and threads) - the NNTP bits which should be able to return emails and/or threads - the stats module which want to give information to the user about the health of the list itself (emails/month, last threads, biggest threads...) - archives retrieval (we probably want to give the user a way to download the archives since the creation of the list/the last year/month) All of these components needs to be aware about the archives. We agreed that the core does not want to know about it. So we have several solutions: - each module becomes an "archiver" wrt to core, meaning each module has its own way to storing the archives (and eventually its own system to do so) - we create a archive-core module which manage the archives and provides an API to access, modify, extend them. Of course, we prefer the second solution :) So we would have the following architecture: mm-core (handles the lists themselves) --send emails to archivers--> archive-core (store the emails and expose them through an API) --> archivers/stats/NNTP The questions are then: - how do we store the emails ? - how do we expose the API ? - how to make it such that it becomes easy to extend ? (ie: the stats module wants to read the db, but probably also to store information on it) Having played with mongodb (HK relies on it atm), I quite like the possibilities it gives us. We can easily store the emails in it, query them and since it is a NoSQL database system extending it becomes also easy. On the other hand, having the archiver-core relying on the same system as the core itself would be nicer from a sysadmin pov. I have not tried to upload archives to a RDBMS and test its speed, but for mongodb the results of the tests are presented at [1]. The challenge will be speed and designing an API which allow each component to do its work. I think it would be nice if we could reach some kind of agreement before the GSoC starts (even if we change our mind later on) to be sure that if we get students their work don't overlap too much. The second point I want to present is with respect to the archiver itself. At the moment we have HyperKitty (HK), the current version: - exposes single emails - exposes single threads - presents the archives for one month or day - allows to search the archives using the sender, subject, content or subject and content - presents a summary of the recent activities on the list (including the evolution of the number of post sent over the last month) I think these are the basis functionality that we would like to see in an archiver. But HK aims at much more, the ultimate goal of HK is to provide a "forum-like" interface to the mailing-lists, with it HK would provide a number of option (social-web like) allowing to "like" or "dislike" a post or a thread, allowing to "+1" someone, allowing to tag the mails or assign them categories. These are all nice feature but, imho, they go beyond what one would want from a basic archiver. So what I would like to propose is to split HK into a sub-project (MiniKitty?) which would provide these basic functionality. We would keep HyperKitty as a more extensive archiver and try to bring HK to its ultimate goal. This will need some more work and time as we will have to make HK speak with core for authentication, find a way to send emails to core/the lists and of course add all the other features (tags, categories...) Comments welcome :) Thanks, Pierre [1] http://blog.pingoured.fr/index.php?post/2012/03/16/Mailman-archives-and-mon… * Hi everyone

5 16

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [GSoC 2012] Metrics
by Stephen J. Turnbull 05 Jun '12

05 Jun '12

George Chatzisofroniou writes: > Hello Patrick, > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter > <p(a)state-of-mind.de> wrote: > > Like with most statistical data I mostly see the figures being > > used to give statements on quantity - top poster, number of > > threads etc. Do you think it would be possible to also make some > > statements on quality? +1 For example, I think this would be really useful for class discussion lists and the like (on the theory that the best way to learn a subject is to teach it to others). > The metrics will primarily extract the activity of a mailing list > and its users. > > It is possible to emphasize on the quality of the posts but i think > this is a different app I don't see why. I would think quality metrics would be usefully presented via the same application as quantity metrics. It would be interesting to correlate quality and quantity, for example. Do you mean to say "this is out of scope of my project?" As much as I'd like to see quality metrics provided, I'd have to agree with you that it's out of scope of your project (maybe you could do one or more quality metrics on a time-permitting basis at the end of the period).

3 3

HyperKitty MongoDB vs PostgreSQL.
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 02 Jun '12

02 Jun '12

Dear all, It has been some time since the last info regarding HyperKitty, but the project has made some progress. I have implemented to database interface that I was presented already a month ago [1]. So now there is a standalone project/library, KittyStore [2] which provides an interface to the database. It defines an interface which can then be implemented for whatever database system you would like. At the moment it covers MongoDB and PostgreSQL. Once I implemented this interface I tried to solve the question of which database system should we primarily focus on. I wrote a small comparison test of the two systems on an RHEL6 system [3] (I still have to publish the results for F17). The difference between the two databases system is not so large (1s for a query that already takes 6 seconds) and there was not any tuning of the servers. So I think the advantage of having only one back-end for mailman and its archive is worth this time difference in the results (which might anyway get even better). Thus we will move forward with PostgreSQL as a back-end for HyperKitty. The good news is that HyperKitty already works fine with PostgreSQL and KittyStore (if you use the correct branch [4]). However, we have to rebuild our test server, so we cannot show you how the latest version works right now. So all is nicely getting in place for Aamir to start working on his project and for HK to get further down the road :) I think that's about all I wanted to say, fire away if you have questions! Best regards, Pierre [1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2012-April/022012.html [2] https://github.com/pypingou/kittystore [3] http://blog.pingoured.fr/index.php?post/2012/05/20/PostgreSQL-vs-MongoDB [4] http://bzr.fedorahosted.org/bzr/hyperkitty/rdbms/files

3 3

HyperKitty login
by Stephen J. Turnbull 31 May '12

31 May '12

Aamir Khan writes: > Hi everybody! > > First task I am going to do for my GSoC project is to have login > authentication mechanism for HyperKitty users. I have had discussion with > few mailman developers about it. I am planning to wrap up social_auth into > mm_ui_auth django application. Both postorius and HyperKitty can use this > app for authenticating users. Please explain in somewhat more detail. Not all of us know what "social_auth" is, and since Postorius and HyperKitty are independent apps, presumably there will need to be some design and coordination effort to get everybody on the same page. In the spirit of "DRY" (don't repeat yourself), rather than make long posts here, I suggest that you start a blog or a Wiki page on the Mailman site where you can log (1) your design decisions and (2) any agreements on APIs etc you make with other Mailman developers (or third parties such as maintainers of libraries you use). Then you can simply have a shortcut key and say "I've designed an authentication mechanism for HyperKitty users, which I expect to be extensible for use by Postorius and other Django apps for Mailman. See my blog: http://blogs.example.com/~aamir/gsoc/." George is doing this quite well IMO. Kudos to George! N.B. George is generally copying his blog post to this list. That's OK if you want to do it, but IMO not necessary. (But that's something we will evolve over time, and I defer to Terri's opinion on this kind of thing. This is all just a suggestion.)

6 6

Re: [Mailman-Developers] HyperKitty login
by Florian Fuchs 31 May '12

31 May '12

Hi Aamir, On 05/30/2012 01:45 AM, Aamir Khan wrote: > Hi everybody! > > First task I am going to do for my GSoC project is to have login > authentication mechanism for HyperKitty users. I have had discussion > with few mailman developers about it. I am planning to wrap up > social_auth into mm_ui_auth django application. Both postorius and > HyperKitty can use this app for authenticating users. As you know, Postorius already uses django-social-auth. Implementing it was more or less a configuration issue (settings.py), plus we had to build a login-template (which was pretty trivial). We did look at some other existing solutions before choosing django-social-auth. So far it seems like a good choice. (Although it should be noted, that there was one report about a browserID logged-in user getting logged-out erroneously. But I haven't been able to reproduce this.) Since social-auth has been designed with DRY/re-usability in mind, the important question (at least to me) is: What are the advantages of an mm_ui_auth app wrapper compared to simply using it directly? The main advantage I can think of is shared UI-resources (template, css). But this reduces mm_ui_auth more or less to a "theme only" app (OK, with a few lines of login/logout view code in it). This can make absolute sense, but mainly if both Postorius/HK are OK with sharing the same design for the login-/out pages. I, for one, would be fine with that. (Well, let's see how it looks first. But still... ;-) Cheers, Florian

1 0

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [Bug 1006345] Anonymous subscription via confirmation email
by Richard Wackerbarth 30 May '12

30 May '12

On May 30, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Robert Niederreiter wrote: > actually, in postorius you need to be authenticated in order to > subscribe to a list > > "anonymous" refers to the authentication in postorius in this case > > it would be nice to just have subscription form available to the public, > sending a "subscription confirmation" to the entered mail address with a > confirmation link, finally do the list subscription if confirmation link > gets clicked. > > Robert +2 :)

1 0

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [Bug 1006345] [NEW] Anonymous subscription via confirmation email
by Richard Wackerbarth 30 May '12

30 May '12

I think that it is important for this to be controlled an administrative list policy setting. When someone logs in using BrowserID, for example, and then subscribes to a new mailing list, the subscription can be marked as "email confirmed". But if they simply enter an email address on a form, the website need to be able to trigger the issuance of a "request subscription confirmation" email. Richard On May 30, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Robert Niederreiter wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Currently it is not possible to subscribe as anonymous user. > > ** Affects: postorius > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > ** Tags: anonymous confirmation subscription ui

1 0

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

Mailman-Developers May 2012