Mailman 3 September 2002 - Mailman-Developers

jaguar brings out the best..
by 4tune Cookie 04 Sep '02

04 Sep '02

Dear bwarsaw, ; ) excellent to see another fan of X is in a position to help, have tried installing mailman but to no success, a fink package would be superb or even better, configured to use with Postfix. tried on x10.1.3-5, os 10.2 not yet will have anotyher go and see where i get stuck again i will assist in anyway i can, i have postfix running at the moment. cookie. g4-dp-768mb-120gb-dvdR-dvdRAM

2 1

[ mailman-Bugs-604701 ] apparent duplicate file
by noreply＠sourceforge.net 04 Sep '02

04 Sep '02

Bugs item #604701, was opened at 2002-09-04 15:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604701&group_i… Category: documentation Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ross Boylan (rboylan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: apparent duplicate file Initial Comment: doc/posting-flow-chart and posting-flow-chart.png appear to be the same file in the same format, though they have slightly different lengths. If they are the same, I suggest eliminating one. I also suggest using the .png extension if it is a png file. Finally, both should be marked as binary, but that is a more general problem for which I will submit a separate bug. This is based on the latest from cvs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-09-04 22:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 I don't mean they're unreadable, I mean they're unreadable! For me the font was so small I couldn't read the text. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ross Boylan (rboylan) Date: 2002-09-04 22:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=300987 That's odd; I have no trouble reading them. Perhaps you are on a system that does some cr/lf translation that mine doesn't? I'm on Linux. running cvs 1.11.2. Of course, if that was the problem, setting the mode to binary should fix it. But I don't know if cvs client picks up on a mode change on the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-09-04 21:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Both the pngs were unreadable, so I removed them. Use the .ps file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604701&group_i…

1 0

trying to tweak adminstrative options
by Adam Lacey 04 Sep '02

04 Sep '02

Apologize in advance if this isnt the mailing to help me, but if anyone can I would appreciate it. I am running mailman to manage lists. It works fine as intended, however I want to restrict access to certain adminstrative features (message size, etc). However I want to keep access to other adminstrative features (membership management, desrciptions, greeting message, etc.). I thought if I could find where the pages for the list administration options are created, I could simply remove the options that I dont want the list administrators access to, and if I wanted to change those options, I could simply edit via the command line (config_list). However, I dont know the structure of the program, or if there is a semi-easy solution. Could anybody shed some light on where that particular content is made, where I could edit it, or if I can. Thanks for the help _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

2 1

[ mailman-Bugs-604701 ] apparent duplicate file
by noreply＠sourceforge.net 04 Sep '02

04 Sep '02

Bugs item #604701, was opened at 2002-09-04 12:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604701&group_i… Category: documentation Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ross Boylan (rboylan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: apparent duplicate file Initial Comment: doc/posting-flow-chart and posting-flow-chart.png appear to be the same file in the same format, though they have slightly different lengths. If they are the same, I suggest eliminating one. I also suggest using the .png extension if it is a png file. Finally, both should be marked as binary, but that is a more general problem for which I will submit a separate bug. This is based on the latest from cvs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ross Boylan (rboylan) Date: 2002-09-04 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=300987 That's odd; I have no trouble reading them. Perhaps you are on a system that does some cr/lf translation that mine doesn't? I'm on Linux. running cvs 1.11.2. Of course, if that was the problem, setting the mode to binary should fix it. But I don't know if cvs client picks up on a mode change on the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-09-04 18:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Both the pngs were unreadable, so I removed them. Use the .ps file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604701&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-604701 ] apparent duplicate file
by noreply＠sourceforge.net 04 Sep '02

04 Sep '02

Bugs item #604701, was opened at 2002-09-04 15:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604701&group_i… Category: documentation Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ross Boylan (rboylan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: apparent duplicate file Initial Comment: doc/posting-flow-chart and posting-flow-chart.png appear to be the same file in the same format, though they have slightly different lengths. If they are the same, I suggest eliminating one. I also suggest using the .png extension if it is a png file. Finally, both should be marked as binary, but that is a more general problem for which I will submit a separate bug. This is based on the latest from cvs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-09-04 21:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Both the pngs were unreadable, so I removed them. Use the .ps file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604701&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-604704 ] certain files not marked as binary
by noreply＠sourceforge.net 04 Sep '02

04 Sep '02

Bugs item #604704, was opened at 2002-09-04 15:56 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604704&group_i… Category: documentation Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ross Boylan (rboylan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: certain files not marked as binary Initial Comment: Based on the latest code from cvs and inspection of the relevant Entries files, it seems that some items in the doc subdirectories (specifically, in IPC7 and LISA-98 all the gz files) are not marked as binary. They should be. doc/posting-flow-chart.ps *is* marked as binary. I believe that ps files can be treated as text. In an earlier bug I said that the posting-flowchart graphics were not marked as binary; that was incorrect. It's only the material in the subdirectories that is not marked as binary. A spot check of one of the files with gzip says its still OK, so the error may not be too significant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-09-04 21:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Actually, the two png files are unreadable, so I'm removing them. I'm also unmarking posting-flow-chart.ps as binary, and marking the others as binary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604704&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-604841 ] simulate bounce
by noreply＠sourceforge.net 04 Sep '02

04 Sep '02

Bugs item #604841, was opened at 2002-09-04 21:26 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604841&group_i… Category: Web/CGI Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Justin (returnthis) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: simulate bounce Initial Comment: It would be great to add a "simulate invalid address" to the authorization page. e.g. along with the Defer/Accept/Reject/Discard options. This would simply send an invalid address message back to the sender. Usually used for spam emails with members only posting. Would greatly reduce spam as the invalid address would be removed by most automated spamming systems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604841&group_i…

1 0

trying to tweak adminstrative options
by Adam Lacey 04 Sep '02

04 Sep '02

Apologize in advance if this isnt the mailing to help me, but if anyone can I would appreciate it. I am running mailman to manage lists. It works fine as intended, however I want to restrict access to certain adminstrative features (message size, etc). However I want to keep access to other adminstrative features (membership management, desrciptions, greeting message, etc.). I thought if I could find where the pages for the list administration options are created, I could simply remove the options that I dont want the list administrators access to, and if I wanted to change those options, I could simply edit via the command line (config_list). However, I dont know the structure of the program, or if there is a semi-easy solution. Could anybody shed some light on where that particular content is made, where I could edit it, or if I can. Thanks for the help _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-604704 ] certain files not marked as binary
by noreply＠sourceforge.net 04 Sep '02

04 Sep '02

Bugs item #604704, was opened at 2002-09-04 12:56 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604704&group_i… Category: documentation Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ross Boylan (rboylan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: certain files not marked as binary Initial Comment: Based on the latest code from cvs and inspection of the relevant Entries files, it seems that some items in the doc subdirectories (specifically, in IPC7 and LISA-98 all the gz files) are not marked as binary. They should be. doc/posting-flow-chart.ps *is* marked as binary. I believe that ps files can be treated as text. In an earlier bug I said that the posting-flowchart graphics were not marked as binary; that was incorrect. It's only the material in the subdirectories that is not marked as binary. A spot check of one of the files with gzip says its still OK, so the error may not be too significant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604704&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-604701 ] apparent duplicate file
by noreply＠sourceforge.net 04 Sep '02

04 Sep '02

Bugs item #604701, was opened at 2002-09-04 12:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604701&group_i… Category: documentation Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ross Boylan (rboylan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: apparent duplicate file Initial Comment: doc/posting-flow-chart and posting-flow-chart.png appear to be the same file in the same format, though they have slightly different lengths. If they are the same, I suggest eliminating one. I also suggest using the .png extension if it is a png file. Finally, both should be marked as binary, but that is a more general problem for which I will submit a separate bug. This is based on the latest from cvs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=604701&group_i…

1 0