On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 10:04 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>> 1) If you keep the From: header as it is then, we will still have the same problems
> Perhaps I wasn't clear. The From: of the outer message would contain the
> list address. The From: of its message/rfc822 payload would be unchanged
> from that of the incoming message.
> My questions only had to do with the Reply-To: of the outer message in
> cases where the list was set to mung Reply-To: in some way.
Ah, makes sense, sorry
>> 2) the purpose of the encapsulation message/rfc822 is not meant to preserve the DKIM signature, DKIM is not meant to be verified by MUAs
> No, but that is a side effect, at least where content filtering has not
> altered the message.