Mailman 3 February 2005 - Mailman-Developers

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Milter subsystem telling sendmail todiscard Mailman digests
by Tokio Kikuchi 01 Feb '05

01 Feb '05

Jeff Groves wrote: > So, I'm going to have to learn python and figure out where it's not > putting the Date: header and make it do it myself. > Hi, I think I can fix this in Handlers/ToDigest.py The digests don't go through Message.py which was fixed in 2.1 beta 1. # I think someone posted the patch but it slipped off from my search paths. -- Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-u.ac.jp http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/

1 0

Re: [Mailman-Users] respond_to_post_requests and header_filter_rules
by Tokio Kikuchi 01 Feb '05

01 Feb '05

Hi again, Ivan Fetch wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for your reply -- I'm using Mailman 2.1.5 (sorry for not > mentioning this previously). We'd rather be able to configure the > filters to hold (not discard) spam, at least for those lists where the > list administrators prefer to double check what is being tagged as spam. > You can create two or more new header_filter_rules. I suggest you create one for hold and another for discard. You can add a test regex into the first box and when you learn that it works right then move it to the second one to discard the spam silently. > Is the help text of respond_to_post_requests inaccurate in how it > claims that notifying posters of held messages excludes spam filtering? Historically, it was right statement once upon a time in 2.0.x era. -- Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-u.ac.jp http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/

1 0

Re: [Mailman-Users] respond_to_post_requests and header_filter_rules
by Tokio Kikuchi 31 Jan '05

31 Jan '05

Hi, Ivan Fetch wrote: > Hello, > > I'm wondering whether there is a way to have respond_to_post_requests > set to yes (so that senders will be notified if their message is held > due to posting to a members-only list, their message exceeds mailman's > size limit, Etc), yet not send notifications to senders who's messages > are held because they match a filter rule (privacy | spam ). > > The help section of respond_to_post_requests says the following, > which leads me to believe that it will not notify senders of messages > which match spam filter rules: > "Approval notices are sent when mail triggers certain of the limits > except routine list moderation and spam filters, for which notices are > not sent. This option overrides ever sending the notice." > Looks like this detail is outdated. I think new spam filters should be used to silently discard the known spams. Ivan, what version are you using? Newer version has more generic header_filter_rules to hold/reject/discard such messages. Developers, I think I will remove 'spam filters' from the detailed description above but what is the 'routine list moderation'? I think list-wide moderation was replaced by per-member moderation, right? > > However when I send a message to a list and it matches against a spam > filter, I receive an email back notifying me that my message was held > because a filter was matched. It would be nice to be able to avoid > responding to messages which Mailman matches against the spam filters, > as often the From address is forged anyhow... > > IS there something I'm missing which will give me the behavior I'm > looking for RE: spam filtering? > > > Thank you - Ivan Fetch. > > -- Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-u.ac.jp http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/

1 0