November 2003 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Nov 1 05:13:08 EDT 2003
Ending: Sun Nov 30 19:17:25 EDT 2003
Messages: 192

• [spambayes-dev] 1.0a7   Anthony Baxter
• [spambayes-dev] 1.0a7   Anthony Baxter
• [spambayes-dev] Re: 1.0a7   Anthony Baxter
• [spambayes-dev] Re: 1.0a7   Anthony Baxter
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Anthony Baxter
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Anthony Baxter
• [spambayes-dev] It's only money   Anthony Baxter
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] Outlook Envelope Tray Icon   Brendon
• Proposal[spambayes-dev] Business opportunity   Auto Auction Center
• [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Outlook Envelope Tray Icon   Bob Chojnacki
• [spambayes-dev] Whitelists (was: A spectacular false positive)   Matthew Dixon Cowles
• [spambayes-dev] Accessing delivery time of an email message!   Sanjay Darisi
• [spambayes-dev] Idea to re-energize corpus learning   Martin Stone Davis
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Idea to re-energize corpus learning   Martin Stone Davis
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Idea to re-energize corpus learning   Martin Stone Davis
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Idea to re-energize corpus learning   Martin Stone Davis
• [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Outlook Envelope Tray Icon   Chris Dellario
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Toby Dickenson
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Toby Dickenson
• [spambayes-dev] Code locations in Spambayes Outlook plugin   TP Diffenbach
• [spambayes-dev] test -- can I use an arbitrary from address?   TP Diffenbach
• FW: [spambayes-dev] Code locations in Spambayes Outlook plugin   TP Diffenbach
• [spambayes-dev] Can't move items that are in the results list from an Outlook Find when SpamBayes is installed   Eckert, Robert D
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] Website bug and proposed fix   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] (no subject)   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] RE: Accessing delivery time of an email message!   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] Can't move items that are in the results list froman Outlook Find when SpamBayes is installed   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] FW: [Spambayes] Problem with Spam bayesinstallation on Windows 2000pc   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] FW: [Spambayes] Problem with Spam bayesinstallation on Windows 2000pc   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] "X-" as a prefix for experimental options   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Mark Hammond
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Question about binary installer!   Thomas Heller
• [spambayes-dev] Re: 1.0a7   Thomas Heller
• [spambayes-dev] Re: 1.0a7   Thomas Heller
• [spambayes-dev] Re: 1.0a7   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Re: 1.0a7   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] Lotus Notes filter error KeyError: ('Hammie', 'header_spam_string')   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Hunter-killer drones   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Hunter-killer drones   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Hunter-killer drones   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Offer to Help / Development Participation   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Website bug and proposed fix   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Whitelists (was: A spectacular false positive)   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] RE: Bug in UserInterface.py   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes-checkins] spambayes/spambayes message.py, 1.40, 1.41   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes-checkins] spambayes/spambayesmessage.py, 1.40, 1.41   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Richie Hindle
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Rob Hooft
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Rob Hooft
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Rob Hooft
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Rob Hooft
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Rob Hooft
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Rob Hooft
• [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Outlook Envelope Tray Icon   Ryan Malayter
• [spambayes-dev] Native Outlook 2003 spam filtering   Justin Mason
• [spambayes-dev] Who can explain this?   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] Lotus Notes filter error KeyError:('Hammie', 'header_spam_string')   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Spambayes 1.0a7 - windowsproxy_tray installation   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Offer to Help / Development Participation   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] OptionsClass.is_valid too picky?   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Three patches for better Evolution integration   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] Three patches for better Evolution integration   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] Three patches for better Evolution integration   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Three patches for better Evolutionintegration   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] Three patches for better Evolution integration   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Tony Meyer
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] less is more?   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] OptionsClass.is_valid too picky?   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] Another tweak to try - asciify_subject   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] sb_filter change   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] Who can explain this?   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] proposal for more uniform option setting from the command line   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] proposal for more uniform option setting from the command line   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] proposal for more uniform option setting from thecommand line   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] proposal for more uniform option setting from the command line   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] Re: proposal for more uniform option setting from the command line   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] Whitelists (was: A spectacular false positive)   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] OptionsClass.is_valid too picky?   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] Idea to re-energize corpus learning   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] OptionsClass.is_valid too picky?   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Idea to re-energize corpus learning   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] more selective Received: header mining...   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] "X-" as a prefix for experimental options   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] "X-" as a prefix for experimental options   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Skip Montanaro
• [spambayes-dev] Three patches for better Evolution integration   Sjoerd Mullender
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes-checkins] spambayes/spambayes message.py, 1.40, 1.41   Sjoerd Mullender
• [spambayes-dev] Three patches for better Evolution integration   Sjoerd Mullender
• [spambayes-dev] (no subject)   Kevin Patterson
• [spambayes-dev] Reviewing trained messages   Bernard Payne
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] Hunter-killer drones   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] RE: Bug in UserInterface.py   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] Code locations in Spambayes Outlook plugin   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] Code locations in Spambayes Outlook plugin   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] Native Outlook 2003 spam filtering   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] Native Outlook 2003 spam filtering   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] OptionsClass.is_valid too picky?   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] OptionsClass.is_valid too picky?   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] OptionsClass.is_valid too picky?   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Idea to re-energize corpus learning   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] It's only money   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Three patches for better Evolution integration   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] more selective Received: header mining...   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] Clever avoidance technique   Tim Peters
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] Re: 1.0a7   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Spambayes 1.0a7 - windows proxy_tray installation   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Outlook Envelope Tray Icon   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Outlook Envelope Tray Icon   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] RE: Bug in UserInterface.py   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] proposal for more uniform option setting from thecommand line   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] proposal for more uniform option setting from thecommand line   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] Code locations in Spambayes Outlook plugin   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Spambayes 1.0a7 - windowsproxy_tray installation   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] FW: [Spambayes] Problem with Spam bayes installation on Windows 2000pc   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] FW: [Spambayes] Problem with Spam bayesinstallation on Windows 2000pc   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] FW: [Spambayes] Problem with Spam bayesinstallation on Windows 2000pc   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes-checkins] spambayes/spambayesmessage.py, 1.40, 1.41   Kenny Pitt
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   T. Alexander Popiel
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   T. Alexander Popiel
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   T. Alexander Popiel
• [spambayes-dev] imbalance within ham or spam training sets?   T. Alexander Popiel
• [spambayes-dev] proposal for more uniform option setting from the command line   T. Alexander Popiel
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   T. Alexander Popiel
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   T. Alexander Popiel
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   T. Alexander Popiel
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   T. Alexander Popiel
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Jens Rantil
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Jens Rantil
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Remi Ricard
• [spambayes-dev] Hunter-killer drones   Neil Schemenauer
• [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Pablo Vieira
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] Outlook Envelope Tray Icon   Adam Walker
• [spambayes-dev] Clever avoidance technique   Greg Ward
• [spambayes-dev] Three patches for better Evolution integration   Barry Warsaw
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Barry Warsaw
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Barry Warsaw
• [spambayes-dev] Re: [Spambayes] RV: I18N and L10N   Barry Warsaw
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Three patches for better Evolution integration   Barry Warsaw
• [spambayes-dev] Re: Three patches for better Evolution integration   Barry Warsaw
• [spambayes-dev] Three patches for better Evolution integration   Barry Warsaw
• [spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive   Barry Warsaw
• [spambayes-dev] More CVS branch/tags questions   Barry Warsaw
• [spambayes-dev] Hunter-killer drones   papaDoc
• [spambayes-dev] proposal for more uniform option setting from the command line   papaDoc
• [spambayes-dev] Question about binary installer!   sanjaydarisi at cox.net
• [spambayes-dev] Quick questions!   sanjaydarisi at cox.net

Last message date: Sun Nov 30 19:17:25 EDT 2003
Archived on: Sun Nov 30 19:17:32 EDT 2003

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...