Mailman 3 November 2002 - Mailman-Users

namespace per virtual possible?
by Paul Reilly 01 Nov '02

01 Nov '02

Hi, I'm using Mailman 2.0.13 in a virtual domain environment. I want to have lists with the same name but on different virtual domains. ie: news@mydomain and news@yourdomain Is this possible in 2.0.x ? Is this possible in 2.1? Thanks Paul

2 1

FW: [Mailman-Users] Mail is not Forwarded
by jsingh 01 Nov '02

01 Nov '02

> Yeah the qrunner is running perfectly fine, every one minute. I also > got a digest of five messages. But didn't send individual messages. I > made sure in the personal settings that I was not setup of digested > messages. I changed it to individual messages and sent messages out > but to no avail. Now when I look in the maillog it says > message=queued. I don't understand why. > -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Portzer [mailto:jeremyp@pobox.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:57 PM To: jsingh(a)fdu.edu Cc: Mailman mailing list management users Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mail is not Forwarded On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 14:04, jsingh wrote: > Hey Guys > I have a similar problem described in the faqs. I have followed the > suggestions , but of no avail. > This is the problem, users are able to send the mail to the mailing > list, but no one in the mailing list is getting any email. > When I look in the maillog, it says sendmail has sent the stuff. > I restarted sendmail with different configuration where sendmail was > listening on two ports and Delivery mode was set to defer. > Still the messages are not being sent. I can check the message though > over the net in the archives. Is your qrunner running? Did you install the crontabs as specified in the installation instructions? --Jeremy

1 0

Mail is not Forwarded
by jsingh 01 Nov '02

01 Nov '02

Hey Guys I have a similar problem described in the faqs. I have followed the suggestions , but of no avail. This is the problem, users are able to send the mail to the mailing list, but no one in the mailing list is getting any email. When I look in the maillog, it says sendmail has sent the stuff. I restarted sendmail with different configuration where sendmail was listening on two ports and Delivery mode was set to defer. Still the messages are not being sent. I can check the message though over the net in the archives. Thanks Any Ideas Jaskaran Singh University Systems & Security Fairleigh Dickinson University Teaneck, NJ 07666

2 1

Re: OFFTOPIC Re: [Mailman-Users] Archive URL in postings (2.1b3)
by J C Lawrence 01 Nov '02

01 Nov '02

On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 05:18:56 -0600 John Buttery <john(a)io.com> wrote: > Well, my point was that you would get one mailing with a List-ID: > header that you could assume was addressed to the list, but then you > wouldn't know if that was the only posting or if you should be > expecting another email, without a List-ID: header, as indicated by > the presence of your personal address in the To: field. True: -- In the general case the direct message would have arrived first (the reverse happens, if rarely). -- You may never have received the courtesy copy anyway -- its not reliable with either header form. -- Add just a little latency (say 20 minutes) and you can fairly safely assume that if you are to get both, you already have both. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. claw(a)kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.

1 0

Mailman version 2.1b4 problem
by Michael Smith 01 Nov '02

01 Nov '02

I got this email today after installing 2.1b4 (which does work otherwise normally....) Subject: Cron <mailman@defiant> /usr/local/bin/python -S /home/mailman/cron/mailpasswds Site list is missing: mailman Any pointers? Regards, Mike

5 4

Re: OFFTOPIC Re: [Mailman-Users] Archive URL in postings (2.1b3)
by J C Lawrence 01 Nov '02

01 Nov '02

On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:35:01 -0600 John Buttery <john(a)io.com> wrote: > * J C Lawrence <claw(a)kanga.nu> [2002-10-29 19:51:03 -0800]: >> John Buttery <john(a)io.com> wrote: > Thinking that the address in the To: field is an address that the > sender originally targeted directly may not be universal, but I think > it's pretty close. *shrug* I find that most people (unofficial survey, extensive conversations, total population probably >30, <100) pay that much attention to the headers on list-related posts, and when they do, more or less consider all the addresses in the headers to be the "intended destination" without distinguishing which header is which. Private email is a >little< different in that people do seem to start to distinguish among the headers, but not a whole lot. >> One has a List-ID header, one doesn't. >> >> One has an In-Reply-To that references my prior post, one doesn't. > You're right about this, I hadn't fully thought things out before I > said that. However, it doesn't solve the problem of not knowing > whether one of these list postings is the first of two duplicates, or > just a normal posting. Err, the one without the List-ID is the direct mail and the one with is the one via the list. > Someone just posted something about the In-Reply-To: header that may > or may not refute that part, but it's moot because your point stands > on the List-ID: header alone. <nods> > True, and I take that statement back for the same reasons as above. > :p And, of course, I was not encouraging people to post private emails > on-list, which is a MASSIVE etiquette breach...I was just trying to > point out a situation in which "information loss" would happen. No worries. Part of the background logic on all this is that the To: and Cc: headers are actually meaningless. Sure, most people don't know that, but I would expect that the members of this list are very comfortable with the fact that the To: and Cc: headers need have absolutely no relation to the original or current message envelope. As such they start out being weak suggestions, not statements. If you really want to know, and you trust the Received: headers (which are themselves not totally trustworthy, but that's another matter) look for destination envelope comments in the Received: headers. Received: from mail.python.org ([12.155.117.29]) by kanga.nu with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 187IQu-0005ed-00 for <claw(a)kanga.nu>; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:44:36 -0800 -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. claw(a)kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.

2 1

by Shelly 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

Hello.......I am needing some major help with setting mine up.......Could someone email me a detailed description on how? None of what I am reading makes any sense.Thank you. ~Shelly Hunter~ http://Anything4Love.net http://KwikMed.com/store/142767/ http://hop.clickbank.net/?Shelly530/e2success http://www.anything4love.net/guestbook/addentry.php http://tools.addme.com/servlet/popview?id=107131 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free..I checked it MYSELF..... Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 10/03/2002

1 0

Transferring mailing list to another system
by Greg Long 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

Which files/directories do I have to copy over to the new system also running mailman? Thanks, Greg

1 0

Mailman-Users November 2002