I want all mails sent to the list to come from the list's email address...
But, in this case, if the user forgets to sign their name at the
bottom of their mail body, effectively the mail to the list is
anonymous...!
Is there a way to add the user name (or email address) to the top of
each mail so that the mails have the name of the sender, while the
mail itself comes from the list address?
I have looked high and low for an answer, but noone seems to have the solution.
Thank you!
Mal
Hi,
I received the following error this morning. So I rerun configure again with the following command: ./configure --with-cgi-id=apache --prefix=/var/mailman. I'm still getting the same error. Is there any place that I can look for so that I can debug this problem better? Perhaps, looking at the config history file or something. Any other places that I can check the cause of this error?
"Mailman CGI error!!!
The Mailman CGI wrapper encountered a fatal error. This entry is being stored in your syslog:
Group mismatch error. Mailman expected the CGI
wrapper script to be executed as group "nobody", but
the system's web server executed the CGI script as
group "apache". Try tweaking the web server to run the
script as group "nobody", or re-run configure,
providing the command line option `--with-cgi-gid=apache'."
Thanks
Mary
Hi, This problem is not caused by mailman, but I still want to give it a
shot here. I'm hosting a mailing list on top of mailman. Emails are
supposed to be sent out by AWS ses. However, ses requires that sender
address must be verified, which leads to a problem that emails sent by
subscribers to mailing list cannot be sent to other subcirbers, since their
addresses are not verified. And it is impossible to verified every
subscriber. Are there smtp service providers allowing unverified email
address to send out emails, or do I have other solutions?
Thanks.
Leon
Hi,
This is a weird one. I think of myself as knowing my way around Mailman
pretty well for a user/admin/installer/upgrader. I'm upgrading to a
Debian 9 system from CentOS 6.5. Debian's Apache configs took a bit of
getting used to, but I actually like them better. It uses Apache 2.4.2.
I wanted to install Mailman from source, since the latest version is
2.1.26, Debian has 2.1.23, and IIRC that's too old to have some screen
reader optimizations I want. So I built, installed, all working well. I
copied over the Mailman config from my CentOS system to use in Apache,
making some changes so it'd work under 2.4.2. Here it is:
--------------------
#
# httpd configuration settings for use with mailman.
#
ScriptAlias /mailman/ /usr/lib/mailman/cgi-bin/
<Directory /usr/lib/mailman/cgi-bin/>
AllowOverride None
Options ExecCGI
Require all granted
</Directory>
Alias /pipermail/ /var/lib/mailman/archives/public/
<Directory /var/lib/mailman/archives/public>
Options Indexes MultiViews FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
Require all granted
AddDefaultCharset Off
</Directory>
# Uncomment the following line, to redirect queries to /mailman to the
# listinfo page (recommended).
# RedirectMatch ^/mailman[/]*$ /mailman/listinfo
--------------------
The problem is that the CGI isn't working. If I go to
http://temphostname/mailman/listinfo/mailman for example, Apache says
/usr/lib/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/mailman doesn't exist. If I just go to
/mailman/listinfo I get an Elf binary thrown at me, rather than the page
saying there are no advertised lists. If I do the same thing from the
server using the Lynx web browser, I get the same binary thrown at me,
with a page title, "Mailman CGI error!" It sounds to me like Apache
2.4.2 isn't seeing that /usr/lib/mailman/cgi-bin is, in fact, CGI
scripts, and is trying to treat them like regular files. Has something
else changed between Apache versions?
Thanks,
Jayson
Dear Mailman Cognoscenti,
I'm helping one of my list owners send out 5K plus invitations to
students to subscribe to his mailing list. Our current configuration:
Mailman v2.1.20
RHEL v5.11
Semdmail v8.13.8
Apache v2.2.3
Since this was the first time doing this, I suggested breaking the
batch input into 3 groups, 50, 500, and the rest. The 50 went fine,
as did the 500, but the largest batch gave him a generic web server
error:
> Internal Server Error
>
> The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was
> unable to complete your request.
>
> Please contact the server administrator, root(a)conundrum.unh.edu and
> inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might
> have done that may have caused the error.
>
> More information about this error may be available in the server
> error log.
I looked at the logs and I couldn't find anything that hinted at what
went wrong. So I asked the owner to send me the last back and I'd
give it a try. I wrote a script that removed folks already subscribed
to his list and split the remaining subscribers up into 6 files with a
thousand records each. I just tried uploading the 1st batch of 1K,
with the following options:
Subscribe these users now... (*) Invite
Send welcome message... (*) No
Send notifications... (*) No
And entered a 7 line paragraph explaining the invitation.
I ended up having the same error happen. Looking at the Mailman logs,
I can't see any difference before or after my submission. In the
HTTPD logs, I see:
>> [Fri Aug 26 19:59:23 2016] [warn] [client 132.177.215.132] Timeout
>> waiting for output from CGI script
>> /usr/local/mailman/cgi-bin/admin, referer:
>> https://lists.unh.edu/mailman/admin/campus.connection/members/add
>> [Fri Aug 26 19:59:23 2016] [error] [client 132.177.215.132]
>> Premature end of script headers: admin, referer:
>> https://lists.unh.edu/mailman/admin/campus.connection/members/add
So is there an inherent limit to the number of invites that can be
submitted via the web form?
As a work around, how would I do large invites on behalf of the owner
from the command line, including the 'extra text' that is allowed via
the web interface?
--
Cordially,
the UNH Mailing List Server Admins
Bill Costa, senior admin
(603) 862-3056
Hi
We have a problem since we updated from Mailman 2.1.27 -> 2.1.29
(FreeBSD). If we try to add an User on the Webgui "members/add" the Gui
says successfully added and in the logs we see this:
> logs/subscribe:Sep 20 10:04:59 2018 (20772) ugh_panteghini.ch: new
> shouldfail(a)pascalchristen.ch, admin mass sub
The user even get his confirmation mail with the password and link to
his account. But if he tries to log in it says he's not authorized:
> logs/mischief:Sep 20 10:09:48 2018 (33059) Login failure with private
> rosters: shouldfail(a)pascalchristen.ch from X.X.X.X
> logs/security:Sep 20 10:09:48 2018 (33059) Authorization failed
> (private): user=shouldfail(a)pascalchristen.ch: list=ugh_panteghini.ch:
> remote=X.X.X.X
And if I check it with the command line tool the user isn't added:
> ./list_members ugh_panteghini.ch
> ...
> shouldbeok(a)pascalchristen.ch
Sometimes we're able to add an user when we set the "Send notifications
about new registrations to the list owner?" to No. But it's like 50/50
if it works then or not.
Do you guys have any idea whats wrong?
Greetings Pascal
Folks:
I'm curious as to how people are setting 'dmarc_none_moderation_action'... which
controls how Mailman handles domains with a dmarc policy action of none (like
gmail.com).
Is there a compelling reason to set it to Yes so that messages from such domains
are munged or wrapped?
Thanks!
david
--
IBM i on Power Systems: For when you can't afford to be out of business!
I'm riding 615 miles (Yes, you read that right) in the American Diabetes
Association's Tour de Cure to raise money for diabetes research, education,
advocacy, and awareness. You can make a tax-deductible donation to my ride by
visiting https://gmane.diabetessucks.net.
You can see where my donations come from by visiting my interactive donation map
... https://gmane.diabetessucks.net/map (it's a geeky thing).
I may have diabetes, but diabetes doesn't have me!
i have a list that only a few people are allowed to post to. I had done this by
putting everyone on the list to "MOD" and put the handful of people authorized
to post into the OK addresses field on the general tab. It turns out that one of the
authorized people is also ON the list, and I discovered that the MOD setting in
the membership list overrides the authorized field on the general tab.
I'd like to be able to manage the authorized posters separately from the
subscribed posters. Is there a way to do that? [my idea here is that it is easy to
see all the 'authorized' addresses because they're in one place [on the general
tab]. Much easier than finding all of the non-MOD entries on the list and then
adding to it the unsubscribed-but -authorized addresses from the general tab.
Is there a way to do that?
/Bernie\
Bernie Cosell
bernie(a)fantasyfarm.com
-- Too many people; too few sheep --
Hi everyone,
I am very new to Ubuntu, and having problems with Mailman+Exim integration.
My biggest problem here would be my little knowledge in manipulating things
in Ubuntu.
So here goes:
I followed this link to install: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Mailman
The most important part in this is the MACROS definitions in Exim:
# User and group for Mailman, should match your --with-mail-gid
# switch to Mailman's configure script. Value is normally "mailman"
MM_UID=list
MM_GID=list
Now, posts cannot be delivered because:
2018-12-15 00:00:58 1gXuEg-0006Hn-2J ** testing(a)lists.my.co.ke <
testing-bounces(a)lists.my.co.ke> R=mailman_router T=mailman_transport: Child
process of mailman_transport transport returned 2 from command:
/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman
After consulting Google, I got advised to run a test:
root@lists:/home/wash# /var/lib/mailman/mail/wrapper post
Group mismatch error. Mailman expected the mail
wrapper script to be executed as group "daemon", but
the system's mail server executed the mail script as
group "root". Try tweaking the mail server to run the
script as group "daemon", or re-run configure,
providing the command line option `--with-mail-gid=root'
So, how do I resolve this in Ubuntu 18.04 ??
--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223
"Oh, the cruft."
Hi all,
I've a user send a message with pdf attachments and they ended up as
html links to the web archive. Which is fine except
- content filtering is off,
- scrub attachments is set to no.
I though that was supposed to allow attachments through. I guess I
thought wrong, but what am I missing?
TIA
--
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu